• Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • DMCA
Dirty.Fund
  • Home
  • Fraud
  • Scams
  • Crime
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Fraud
  • Scams
  • Crime
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Dirty.Fund
No Result
View All Result

Pay-per-Click Advertisers Liable Under Lanham Act for Click Fraud

March 12, 2021
in Fraud
Reading Time: 2min read
A A
0
Pay-per-Click Advertisers Liable Under Lanham Act for Click Fraud
0
SHARES
10
VIEWS
ShareShareShareShare

The US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed that pay-per-click advertisers may be liable under the Lanham Act for “click fraud.” WickFire, LLC v. Laura Woodruff et al., Case No. 17-50340 (5th Cir. Feb. 26, 2021) (Owen, J.)

WickFire and TriMax Media are advertisers that compete in the pay-for-performance search engine marketing business, also known as pay-per-click marketing. In this type of marketing, every time a user clicks on an advertisement, the advertiser pays the search engine (i.e., Google) a small fee. If the user makes a purchase on the merchant’s site, the merchant pays the advertiser a commission. When a pay-per-click campaign runs smoothly, the advertiser pays a small amount for a click, the click results in a sale, and the commission to the advertiser is more than the advertiser paid for the click.

WickFire filed a lawsuit against TriMax, alleging that TriMax violated Section 43 of the Lanham Act by committing “click fraud” through repeatedly clicking on WickFire’s ads without any intent to make a purchase, and created false advertisements that were made to appear as though they belonged to WickFire, among other state law claims. Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act prohibits a person from making, “in connection with any goods or services,” a “false designation of origin, false or misleading description of fact, or false or misleading representation of fact, which . . . is likely to cause confusion . . . as to the origin, sponsorship, or approval of his or her goods, services, or commercial activities.” WickFire alleged that the ads included a trademark and links to a WickFire website designed to aggregate coupons for online merchants.

The case went to trial, and a jury found for WickFire with respect to the state law claims and the false advertising claim (although it did not award any damages for violation of the Lanham Act). The jury determined that TriMax misrepresented WickFire as the source of advertisements by placing ads containing identifying information distinct to WickFire in a manner that was likely to cause confusion. TriMax filed for judgment as a matter of law and for a new trial. The district court denied the motions and entered judgment. TriMax appealed.

On appeal, TriMax alleged that WickFire’s Lanham Act claim was foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s decision in Dastar v. Twentieth Century Fox. The Fifth Circuit disagreed. The Court explained that WickFire was not concerned with protecting an original idea, as Fox attempted to do in Dastar. Instead, WickFire was trying to protect the genuineness of its brand.

TriMax next argued that it was entitled to judgment as a matter of law because the jury did not have a legally sufficient evidentiary basis to find for WickFire. The Fifth Circuit thought otherwise, holding that it did not need to decide whether the evidence was sufficient as a matter of law because the jury did not award WickFire damages to the claim. The Court noted that since the jury found that there were no damages, WickFire could not be a prevailing party under the Lanham Act and the issue was moot.

Credit: Source link

SendShareTweetSend
Previous Post

Bankrupt Bay Area developer in SEC fraud case quits real estate empire – East Bay Times

Next Post

4M Pharmaceutical CEO, Mohamed Mokbel, accused of $134M fraud case to be released on home confinement

Next Post
4M Pharmaceutical CEO, Mohamed Mokbel, accused of 4M fraud case to be released on home confinement

4M Pharmaceutical CEO, Mohamed Mokbel, accused of $134M fraud case to be released on home confinement

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
Puerto Rico Operators of Investment Coaching Scheme Banned from Industry and Ordered to Pay Millions in Redress to Defrauded Consumers

Puerto Rico Operators of Investment Coaching Scheme Banned from Industry and Ordered to Pay Millions in Redress to Defrauded Consumers

February 22, 2022
Fifth Tampa man pleads guilty in health care fraud case

Fifth Tampa man pleads guilty in health care fraud case

August 10, 2021
Larby Amirouche the leader of internet marketing schemes charged with defrauding customers and financial institutions of millions of dollars

Larby Amirouche the leader of internet marketing schemes charged with defrauding customers and financial institutions of millions of dollars

January 22, 2023
Allysian Sciences execs sued for $50 million in crypto fraud

Allysian Sciences execs sued for $50 million in crypto fraud

December 16, 2021
Two Baltimore companies on list of possible FTX creditors

Two Baltimore companies on list of possible FTX creditors

May 14, 2023
How Charlie Javice Got JPMorgan to Pay $175 Million for … What Exactly?

How Charlie Javice Got JPMorgan to Pay $175 Million for … What Exactly?

May 14, 2023
U.S. prosecutors probe Silvergate’s dealings with FTX, Alameda -source

U.S. prosecutors probe Silvergate’s dealings with FTX, Alameda -source

May 14, 2023
Jen Shah sentenced to 78 months in prison for her role in nationwide telemarketing fraud scam

Jen Shah sentenced to 78 months in prison for her role in nationwide telemarketing fraud scam

May 14, 2023

Recent News

Two Baltimore companies on list of possible FTX creditors

Two Baltimore companies on list of possible FTX creditors

May 14, 2023
How Charlie Javice Got JPMorgan to Pay $175 Million for … What Exactly?

How Charlie Javice Got JPMorgan to Pay $175 Million for … What Exactly?

May 14, 2023
U.S. prosecutors probe Silvergate’s dealings with FTX, Alameda -source

U.S. prosecutors probe Silvergate’s dealings with FTX, Alameda -source

May 14, 2023
Jen Shah sentenced to 78 months in prison for her role in nationwide telemarketing fraud scam

Jen Shah sentenced to 78 months in prison for her role in nationwide telemarketing fraud scam

May 14, 2023

About

This is an online news portal that aims to share latest news about fraud, scams, crime and much more stuff like that. Feel free to get in touch with us!

What’s New Here!

  • Two Baltimore companies on list of possible FTX creditors
  • How Charlie Javice Got JPMorgan to Pay $175 Million for … What Exactly?
  • U.S. prosecutors probe Silvergate’s dealings with FTX, Alameda -source

Subscribe Now

Loading
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • DMCA

© 2021 - Dirty.Fund - All rights reserved! If you have breaking news, please contact us directly at dirtyfund@protonmail.com

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Fraud
  • Scams
  • Crime
  • Contact Us

© 2021 - Dirty.Fund - All rights reserved! If you have breaking news, please contact us directly at dirtyfund@protonmail.com